Preview available

Thank you, Ege! The tab title part definitely lgtm! Will leave it to Marcin for the rest! (It does work on my computer XD)

https://www.tigerfinch.com/articles/spam-and-email-obfuscation/

https://www.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/z1xzs1/is_it_still_best_practice_to_obfuscate_email/

Those are two articles about this topic.

We spoke about it on the discord channel.

Better solution will be use other social handle,

or use solution like mozilla relay.

This PR doesn't encourage obfuscation it just doesn't enforce for the input to be a valid someone@example.com format. With this, people can choose whatever format they like, since they will be the ones getting the emails.

https://www.tigerfinch.com/articles/spam-and-email-obfuscation/
https://www.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/z1xzs1/is_it_still_best_practice_to_obfuscate_email/
Those are two articles about this topic.
We spoke about it on the discord channel.
Better solution will be use other social handle,
or use solution like mozilla relay.

This PR doesn't encourage obfuscation it just doesn't enforce for the input to be a valid someone@example.com format. With this, people can choose whatever format they like, since they will be the ones getting the emails.

We do exactly that, we expect that email is an email and we use mailto protocol for links after that, thats why we don't expect any security by obscurity.

Why no one have issues those email?

https://www.tigerfinch.com/articles/spam-and-email-obfuscation/
https://www.reddit.com/r/cybersecurity/comments/z1xzs1/is_it_still_best_practice_to_obfuscate_email/
Those are two articles about this topic.
We spoke about it on the discord channel.
Better solution will be use other social handle,
or use solution like mozilla relay.

This PR doesn't encourage obfuscation it just doesn't enforce for the input to be a valid someone@example.com format. With this, people can choose whatever format they like, since they will be the ones getting the emails.

We do exactly that, we expect that email is an email and we use mailto protocol for links after that, thats why we don't expect any security by obscurity.

I think this is mostly a matter of personal preference for the person entering their email, and I believe we should respect that. I'm totally fine with whatever direction you choose, so feel free to modify the PR!

Personally, I agree with Ege. I know my emails are all out there. I know that the obfuscation we were used to don't work in this day and age. But it also became a preference and habit. I don't mind it when that's not allowed. But it'd be also nice if it is 😊

Edit: forgot to say that ofc this is just a personal preference and not a strong way. Like Ege, happy to go either way.

Personally, I agree with Ege. I know my emails are all out there. I know that the obfuscation we were used to don't work in this day and age. But it also became a preference and habit. I don't mind it when that's not allowed. But it'd be also nice if it is 😊

Edit: forgot to say that ofc this is just a personal preference and not a strong way. Like Ege, happy to go either way.

No one force anyone to pass email, but if you provide email address we expect that it's email.
if someone like to "obfuscate" it can be added in the description.

Funny thing is that conversation comes from this PR

at the same time we can see his email everywhere else without any "obfuscation"

Just to summarize, it's possible to add email which is obfuscated but in the description, we expect that email field is empty or it's email.